Physical Risk Analysis for Every Investor Type
The same translation chain serves asset managers, banks, insurers, family offices and research firms. What changes is the output: deal due diligence for one, ICAAP and ORSA documentation for another, portfolio aggregation for a third. The method stays identical; the vocabulary and deliverables match your mandate.
Asset Managers & Fund Selectors
Portfolio risk assessments rely on ESG ratings and sector averages that obscure asset-level exposures. Physical risk due diligence is manual, slow, and inconsistent. Article 8/9 fund disclosures require evidence that existing data providers don't deliver at sufficient granularity.
Focused analyses for specific portfolio segments or new positions. Hazard exposure profiles and financial impact estimates at asset level. Outputs aligned to SFDR/Taxonomy/TCFD disclosure requirements.
A focused analysis of physical risk exposure across a defined portfolio segment, with asset-level evidence packages and financial impact estimates.
Book a consultationBanks & Insurers
Supervisors demand physical risk quantification (ECB SREP, EBA expectations, ICAAP/ORSA) and institutions lack the data infrastructure to deliver defensible answers. Location data is poor, damage functions unavailable, and internal teams build from scratch.
Asset-level evidence packages that produce NEAR/CEAR-compatible loss metrics. Stress-test scenario inputs. Complete audit trail for supervisory review.
Evidence packages aligned to supervisory expectations, with traceable methodology and documentation suitable for regulatory examination.
Discuss Regulatory RequirementsFamily Offices & Private Investors
Concentrated portfolios (real estate, infrastructure, private equity) face outsized physical risk because diversification doesn't protect you. Deal evaluation relies on generic assessments rather than site-specific analysis.
Focused analyses for deal evaluation or portfolio review. Clear, non-technical evidence packages that show the physical risk profile of each asset with financial implications. No jargon, no opaque scores.
Site-specific physical risk assessment for concentrated holdings or deal evaluation, with clear financial implications.
Get Portfolio ReviewResearch Firms & Consultants
Client demand for physical risk analysis is growing, but scaling bespoke research without increasing headcount is the fundamental challenge. QA costs eat margins, tools are fragmented, and every engagement reinvents the wheel.
Embedded research partnerships where Open Beta serves as the production backend for physical risk analysis. Repeatable extraction and structuring workflows. Evidence-linked outputs that research firms can pass to their own clients.
Embedded partnership that provides scalable physical risk analysis capacity with consistent methodology and quality.
Explore PartnershipFrequently asked questions
Last updated